<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DigitalGhost Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the  &quot;AND Circuit&quot; solution is that difficult, or won&#039;t be that difficult when search engines start paying more attention to word relationships. Adding more context to the query doesn&#039;t help much with the AND problem. 

On a humorous note, I did get this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hs=Mwb&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22who+invented+the+AND+circuit%22&amp;btnG=Search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SERP,&lt;/a&gt; returned. 

I don&#039;t think personalization is the long-term answer either but I do think context and proximity should be more thoroughly explored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the  &#8220;AND Circuit&#8221; solution is that difficult, or won&#8217;t be that difficult when search engines start paying more attention to word relationships. Adding more context to the query doesn&#8217;t help much with the AND problem. </p>
<p>On a humorous note, I did get this <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=Mwb&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22who+invented+the+AND+circuit%22&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">SERP,</a> returned. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think personalization is the long-term answer either but I do think context and proximity should be more thoroughly explored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>John Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I have often referred to SEO as the ultimate word game.

That said, I don&#039;t see how long we can expect SEs to accomplish such grand feats as &quot;AND circuit&quot; or even &quot;AND gate&quot;. Even with magic, there is not enough context in the query. I don&#039;t agree the general solution lies in personalization, although that may be a short-term path to better results sets.

I don&#039;t know why the Butler failed, but at least he managed to elicit some context from searchers. I suspect that someday someone will ask searchers to provide some context along with their query... it won&#039;t take much, I think. Multi-part forms (a la Teoma) are too clumsy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often referred to SEO as the ultimate word game.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t see how long we can expect SEs to accomplish such grand feats as &#8220;AND circuit&#8221; or even &#8220;AND gate&#8221;. Even with magic, there is not enough context in the query. I don&#8217;t agree the general solution lies in personalization, although that may be a short-term path to better results sets.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why the Butler failed, but at least he managed to elicit some context from searchers. I suspect that someday someone will ask searchers to provide some context along with their query&#8230; it won&#8217;t take much, I think. Multi-part forms (a la Teoma) are too clumsy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Funny thing, words...

Too true, which is why the search engine business is so interesting to anyone interested in words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Funny thing, words&#8230;</p>
<p>Too true, which is why the search engine business is so interesting to anyone interested in words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claus</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>This is really a comment to DG and not to the interview, although it was a nice read :)

IIRC, it&#039;s just a &quot;gate&quot;, not a full &quot;circuit&quot;. A &quot;gate&quot; search yields somewhat better results, although still far from perfect.

And... (no pun intended, I swear) in Danish &quot;And&quot; is the surname of Donald, who is called &quot;Anders&quot; here, because &quot;and&quot; means &quot;duck&quot;. Funny thing, words... so, there&#039;s a much deeper point than what&#039;s said above :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a comment to DG and not to the interview, although it was a nice read <img src='http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>IIRC, it&#8217;s just a &#8220;gate&#8221;, not a full &#8220;circuit&#8221;. A &#8220;gate&#8221; search yields somewhat better results, although still far from perfect.</p>
<p>And&#8230; (no pun intended, I swear) in Danish &#8220;And&#8221; is the surname of Donald, who is called &#8220;Anders&#8221; here, because &#8220;and&#8221; means &#8220;duck&#8221;. Funny thing, words&#8230; so, there&#8217;s a much deeper point than what&#8217;s said above <img src='http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Your feed link down in the bottom left is wonkadoodle I think if you take the &quot;feed:&quot; out it should be ok. Good interview, and no I have no idea what that costume in the corner is about ... really ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your feed link down in the bottom left is wonkadoodle I think if you take the &#8220;feed:&#8221; out it should be ok. Good interview, and no I have no idea what that costume in the corner is about &#8230; really &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mick g</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>mick g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see Dean has come out of retirement and I wish him all the best in his new venture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see Dean has come out of retirement and I wish him all the best in his new venture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

