<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DigitalGhost Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I don't think the  "AND Circuit" solution is that difficult, or won't be that difficult when search engines start paying more attention to word relationships. Adding more context to the query doesn't help much with the AND problem. 

On a humorous note, I did get this &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=Mwb&#38;hl=en&#38;lr=&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#38;q=%22who+invented+the+AND+circuit%22&#38;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow"&gt;SERP,&lt;/a&gt; returned. 

I don't think personalization is the long-term answer either but I do think context and proximity should be more thoroughly explored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the  &#8220;AND Circuit&#8221; solution is that difficult, or won&#8217;t be that difficult when search engines start paying more attention to word relationships. Adding more context to the query doesn&#8217;t help much with the AND problem. </p>
<p>On a humorous note, I did get this <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=Mwb&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22who+invented+the+AND+circuit%22&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">SERP,</a> returned. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think personalization is the long-term answer either but I do think context and proximity should be more thoroughly explored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>John Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I have often referred to SEO as the ultimate word game.

That said, I don't see how long we can expect SEs to accomplish such grand feats as "AND circuit" or even "AND gate". Even with magic, there is not enough context in the query. I don't agree the general solution lies in personalization, although that may be a short-term path to better results sets.

I don't know why the Butler failed, but at least he managed to elicit some context from searchers. I suspect that someday someone will ask searchers to provide some context along with their query... it won't take much, I think. Multi-part forms (a la Teoma) are too clumsy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often referred to SEO as the ultimate word game.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t see how long we can expect SEs to accomplish such grand feats as &#8220;AND circuit&#8221; or even &#8220;AND gate&#8221;. Even with magic, there is not enough context in the query. I don&#8217;t agree the general solution lies in personalization, although that may be a short-term path to better results sets.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why the Butler failed, but at least he managed to elicit some context from searchers. I suspect that someday someone will ask searchers to provide some context along with their query&#8230; it won&#8217;t take much, I think. Multi-part forms (a la Teoma) are too clumsy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;Funny thing, words...

Too true, which is why the search engine business is so interesting to anyone interested in words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Funny thing, words&#8230;</p>
<p>Too true, which is why the search engine business is so interesting to anyone interested in words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claus</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>This is really a comment to DG and not to the interview, although it was a nice read :)

IIRC, it's just a "gate", not a full "circuit". A "gate" search yields somewhat better results, although still far from perfect.

And... (no pun intended, I swear) in Danish "And" is the surname of Donald, who is called "Anders" here, because "and" means "duck". Funny thing, words... so, there's a much deeper point than what's said above :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a comment to DG and not to the interview, although it was a nice read <img src='http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>IIRC, it&#8217;s just a &#8220;gate&#8221;, not a full &#8220;circuit&#8221;. A &#8220;gate&#8221; search yields somewhat better results, although still far from perfect.</p>
<p>And&#8230; (no pun intended, I swear) in Danish &#8220;And&#8221; is the surname of Donald, who is called &#8220;Anders&#8221; here, because &#8220;and&#8221; means &#8220;duck&#8221;. Funny thing, words&#8230; so, there&#8217;s a much deeper point than what&#8217;s said above <img src='http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Your feed link down in the bottom left is wonkadoodle I think if you take the "feed:" out it should be ok. Good interview, and no I have no idea what that costume in the corner is about ... really ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your feed link down in the bottom left is wonkadoodle I think if you take the &#8220;feed:&#8221; out it should be ok. Good interview, and no I have no idea what that costume in the corner is about &#8230; really &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mick g</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>mick g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/01/15/digitalghost-interview/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>It's good to see Dean has come out of retirement and I wish him all the best in his new venture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see Dean has come out of retirement and I wish him all the best in his new venture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
