<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danny Sullivan Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kelm</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>"It also doesn’t help that you can have people of whatever hat providing work with no results — taking money but giving no real payoff."  Wow, my admiration for Danny just went even higher!  

While dishonest clients can be just as bad, I really believe that if a workable basic model for some kind of "Pay For Performance" SEO compensation (I suggest it be based on "conversion actions", but not "offline sales") can be implemented on a selective, customizeable basis, where it is truly an ethical, long term "win-win" situation for both buyer and seller, it would go a long way in helping the "bad reputation" situation (plus cut down on some of the buyer's educational challenges).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It also doesn’t help that you can have people of whatever hat providing work with no results — taking money but giving no real payoff.&#8221;  Wow, my admiration for Danny just went even higher!  </p>
<p>While dishonest clients can be just as bad, I really believe that if a workable basic model for some kind of &#8220;Pay For Performance&#8221; SEO compensation (I suggest it be based on &#8220;conversion actions&#8221;, but not &#8220;offline sales&#8221;) can be implemented on a selective, customizeable basis, where it is truly an ethical, long term &#8220;win-win&#8221; situation for both buyer and seller, it would go a long way in helping the &#8220;bad reputation&#8221; situation (plus cut down on some of the buyer&#8217;s educational challenges).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>There are v7ndotcom elursrebmem T-Shirts on cafepress already
http://www.cafepress.com/v7n_elursrebmem.44708687</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are v7ndotcom elursrebmem T-Shirts on cafepress already<br />
<a href="http://www.cafepress.com/v7n_elursrebmem.44708687" rel="nofollow">http://www.cafepress.com/v7n_elursrebmem.44708687</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukgimp</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>ukgimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Things are not worrying if you can see them coming though, that's the way you should be looking at it imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are not worrying if you can see them coming though, that&#8217;s the way you should be looking at it imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>It's always great to read what Danny Says away from covering a specific topic - what he says about local reminds me of his presentation at SES last year. That was really worrying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always great to read what Danny Says away from covering a specific topic - what he says about local reminds me of his presentation at SES last year. That was really worrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More News from Today - April 12th » Search Engine Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>More News from Today - April 12th » Search Engine Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>[...] SEGuru Danny Sullivan (UKGimp) - It has been a little quiet on the interview front but I managed to get Danny Sullivan to answer a few questions in his spare time. So here we go…. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SEGuru Danny Sullivan (UKGimp) - It has been a little quiet on the interview front but I managed to get Danny Sullivan to answer a few questions in his spare time. So here we go…. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukgimp</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>ukgimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Yeah, good bloke Danny. Switched on. Although I dont fully agree with everything (automated link spam) I do believe he is right in a hell of a lot he talks about.

The verticals struck a cord, and if you think about it lots of little verticles  make up the the entire coverage that a lot of people try and do. I suppose it is the old niche effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, good bloke Danny. Switched on. Although I dont fully agree with everything (automated link spam) I do believe he is right in a hell of a lot he talks about.</p>
<p>The verticals struck a cord, and if you think about it lots of little verticles  make up the the entire coverage that a lot of people try and do. I suppose it is the old niche effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukgimp.co.uk/2006/04/08/danny-sullivan-interview/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Great new interview from Danny, Gimpy. Very interesting read on his views of the whole SEO industry. I totally agree on the importance of having content rich and worthwhile sites, but it's a case of monetarising them to make all the content worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great new interview from Danny, Gimpy. Very interesting read on his views of the whole SEO industry. I totally agree on the importance of having content rich and worthwhile sites, but it&#8217;s a case of monetarising them to make all the content worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
